Subject: | RE: Re: Sample Rate Conversion |
---|---|
From: | "Michael McInnis" <> |
Date: | Fri, 7 May 2004 08:59:10 -0400 |
It is almost always less damaging to go one analog generation down with goo= d converters to change sample rate, than to use a software converter. The very reason 48k sample rates were introduced in consumer gear was to make i= t difficult to copy CD (44.1K) program in the digital domain. Regards, MM Michael McInnis Productions http://www.mm-pro.com -----Original Message----- From: Lang Elliott Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 7:44 AM To: Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Re: Sample Rate Conversion Will: I have the latest version 4.1. It's converter is essentially identical to that used by 3.2. I've notified the Peak tech folks about the problem and sent them the insect soundfile so they can hear how bad it functions. I should hear back soon. ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Re: Sample Rate Conversion, Lang Elliott |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Sample Rate Conversion, Geoff Sample |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Re: Sample Rate Conversion, Lang Elliott |
Next by Thread: | Re: Sample Rate Conversion, Geoff Sample |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU