naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Re: Sample Rate Conversion

Subject: RE: Re: Sample Rate Conversion
From: "Michael McInnis" <>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 08:59:10 -0400
It is almost always less damaging to go one analog generation down with goo=
d
converters to change sample rate, than to use a software converter.  The
very reason 48k sample rates were introduced in consumer gear was to make i=
t
difficult to copy CD (44.1K) program in the digital domain.

Regards,

MM

Michael McInnis Productions

http://www.mm-pro.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Lang Elliott 
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 7:44 AM
To: 
Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Re: Sample Rate Conversion


Will:

I have the latest version 4.1. It's converter is essentially identical to
that used by 3.2. I've notified the Peak tech folks about the problem and
sent them the insect soundfile so they can hear how bad it functions. I
should hear back soon.



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU