Going the analog route, unfortunately, means playing each file in real time=
.
I really can't afford to do that. ProTools will just have to do for now.
I wonder if enough folks in this group would like to have a copy of my 48Kh=
z
test file, which is an insect singing at around 12kHz. I think it is really
demanding of any sample rate converter going to 44.1.
Let me know if there's some interest and I'll post a wave file on my web
site.
Lang
It is almost always less damaging to go one analog generation down with goo=
d
converters to change sample rate, than to use a software converter. The
very reason 48k sample rates were introduced in consumer gear was to make i=
t
difficult to copy CD (44.1K) program in the digital domain.
Regards,
MM
Michael McInnis Productions
http://www.mm-pro.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Lang Elliott
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 7:44 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Re: Sample Rate Conversion
Will:
I have the latest version 4.1. It's converter is essentially identical to
that used by 3.2. I've notified the Peak tech folks about the problem and
sent them the insect soundfile so they can hear how bad it functions. I
should hear back soon.
"Microphones are not ears,
Loudspeakers are not birds,
A listening room is not nature."
Klas Strandberg
Yahoo! Groups Links
To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<=3DUnsubscribe>
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
|