naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: the nature of parabolic reflectors

Subject: Re: the nature of parabolic reflectors
From: "Rich Peet" <>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 20:02:54 -0000
I hope that someone comes to this years campout with a telinga again.
I think we have one comming.

Putting the ear to words is an age old problem but I would say
nothing is distorted at all. It is more thin and with the highs it is
not as realistic as I would expect.  With more time I could play with
my 32 band equalizer and see how I would curve it back to where I
want to hear it.  I am also sure that would take me a few hours and
it would have to be a complex common sound for me that I recorded
myself.=20

I love the sounds that I have heard from the group in Austrialia and
have played them a lot lately, but the sounds have no reference for
me so there is no way I can really compare how close they are to
reality either.  I can still judge the quality of the "space" but not
the solo.

Rich

--- In  Lang Elliott <>
wrote:
> Rich:
>
> When you say "shrill", do you mean there is too much high frequency
content?
> Or do you mean that the bird song itself is being distorted in some
other
> way.
>
> In other words, please define "shrill" as used in this context.
>
> Lang



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU