naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Critique time for new web site

Subject: RE: Critique time for new web site
From: Wild Sanctuary <>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 15:12:01 -0800
And thank you, Barb. Yeah. I can do that, but for those of us, like
Walt and me, WAV files just take an enormous amount of time to
download and MP3s are a better solution. If we put up 90 second WAV
files, it would take nearly 40 minutes to download a sample on my
machine. We need less data to crunch, I think. Not more.

Bernie

>Bernie,
>
>How about leaving both options up - *.wav and *.mp3
>
>Good Show
>
>Barb Beck
>Edmonton, Alberta, Canada - where a LOT of the White stuff is currently
>falling from the sky
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Walter Knapp 
>Sent: November 19, 2003 3:02 PM
>To: 
>Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Critique time for new web site
>
>From: Wild Sanctuary <>
>>
>>  Thanks for the comments, Walt. I know what you mean because we're on
>>  a land-line modem, too. Can't get DSL or similar because we're rural
>>  and about 25,000 feet from the nearest link. Takes me about 15
>>  minutes do download one of those damned MP3 samples and that's way
>>  too long! Given that I don't want to re-design this thing again in
>>  what's left of my life, I figured I'd order something more toward the
>>  leading edge rather than the Pleistocene technologies you and I still
>>  have. But I'll give this some thought because we'd like it to work.
>>
>>  Bernie
>
>Before you think we are dinosaurs, the majority of internet users
>connect via a regular modem. It's easy to focus on the small group with
>high speed connections, most high speed connections are business.
>Particularly if aiming at individuals modems are still very, very
>common. Even if they have it available, the higher price keeps many off
>the high speed stuff.
>
>I'm not as bad off as you as far as downloading the mp3's from your
>site. But I hardly get full speed out of the 56k modem.
>
>What I do for my site is do a lot of listening. I run up the mp3's at
>various settings and listen. I keep getting the size smaller until I
>don't like what I'm getting and then move back up a little until I
>identify the minimum size that's ok. Better than trying a rote rule, how
>much you can compress varies with each sample.
>
>I'm also very tight on how long my clips are. I pack a lot into a short
>time. Easier to do with ID clips than listening ones.
>
>For any site concerned with selling product the faster your user can get
>things the more likely the sale. People are extremely impatient these
>days. Do note that anyone who's that deep in your site is probably
>partially hooked, which gives you more time to give them the sample.
>
>Walt
>
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


--
Wild Sanctuary, Inc.
P. O. Box 536
Glen Ellen, CA 95442
707-996-6677 tel
707-996-0280 fax
http://www.wildsanctuary.com


________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU