Rich Peet wrote:
> The concept of quality audio is not silly. The idea of paying extra
> for someone to degrade the audio is silly. Especially in a format
> they will not disclose.
That is not what you said. You said that it was substandard because they
did not include your particular preferred format.
Sony has held conferences, given tons of interviews, published a entire
book of standards for MD and ATRAC. It's hard to see how they could have
done more. Except maybe private lessons for you.
The concept of quality is not silly. However, your ideas of what's
quality and what's junk are another thing. Such extremes are hardly the
case.
I fully realize that the naturerecordists group has tossed out MD as a
usable format. And everything I've recorded that people liked so well
they no longer like because it was recorded on MD. It can't be quality
audio.
> Your right I will go elsewhere for a recorder. Marantz seems to be
> winning this year.
To each their own. Follow your dream.
Walt
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
|