--- In Walter Knapp <>
wrote:
> Rich Peet wrote:
>
> > The concept of quality audio is not silly. The idea of paying
extra
> > for someone to degrade the audio is silly. Especially in a format
> > they will not disclose.
>
> That is not what you said. You said that it was substandard because
they
> did not include your particular preferred format.
>
No I didn't.
> Sony has held conferences, given tons of interviews, published a
entire
> book of standards for MD and ATRAC. It's hard to see how they could
have
> done more. Except maybe private lessons for you.
I'd enjoy a book on atrac that is specific and defines exactly what
the different verisions do. I have not found one.
>
> The concept of quality is not silly. However, your ideas of what's
> quality and what's junk are another thing. Such extremes are hardly
the
> case.
I never said it was junk, that is your conclusion.
>
> I fully realize that the naturerecordists group has tossed out MD
as a
> usable format. And everything I've recorded that people liked so
well
> they no longer like because it was recorded on MD. It can't be
quality
> audio.
Not at all. The majority of what I record is md, and it still is
recommended for a lot of naturerecordists.
>
> > Your right I will go elsewhere for a recorder. Marantz seems to
be
> > winning this year.
>
> To each their own. Follow your dream.
>
> Walt
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
|