naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: MS OS versions?

Subject: RE: MS OS versions?
From: "Chris Owens" <>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 19:49:16 +0100
> Win NT is a swiped version of unix in it's core.

It's actualy based on VMS - Cutler, one of the architects of VMS, left
Digital (DEC) and joined Microsoft to became one of the architects on
Windows NT.

Best Wishes,

Chris



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Walter Knapp 
> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 10:52 PM
> To: 
> Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] MS OS versions?
>
>
> richpeet wrote:
> >
> > I am looking at upgrading Win98 2nd edition to XP professional.
> > Ignoring driver avail. as that is a separate issue.
> >
> > Can anyone tell me if I will have an increase or a decrease in
> > efficient processing of sound files on an older computer???
>
> I don't use PC's for sound work, but a few general comments.
> Sound processing is shoveling huge amounts of data around.
> And doing it fast.
>
> The two best things you can do with a older computer to
> improve it's processing of sound files is to upgrade the HD's
> to significantly faster ones, and add more real memory.
>
> The third might be a faster processor, but that would highly
> depend on the speed of everything else, particularly bus
> speeds. This would primarily allow more simultaneous
> filtering, if you are set up for that.
>
> The main job of the OS is to get out of the way, so it tends
> to not be a big influence. Win 2000 & XP are MS rolling in
> Win NT to replace the DOS based version. Win NT is a swiped
> version of unix in it's core. I've been testing original mac
> OS against OS X, which is BSD unix. The OS makes little
> difference in processing, the fact my test machine is a dual
> 1GHZ G4 against my 400MHZ G4 makes most all the difference.
> Initially, the ATA drive in the new machine slowed it down,
> very noticeable improvement occurred when we added Ultra 160
> SCSI drives. The unix base in OS X does get in the way a
> little more, the OS is more reluctant to hand I/O over to a
> program than the Mac OS was. If XP is the same way, that
> might create some problems.
>
> I use Win98 in my mac PC emulator, and Win2000 Pro in my Sony
> laptop. Just looking at those two, no way I'd stick with
> Win98 if I had the opportunity to move up. The newer OS has a
> lot more smoothness to it, and that translates into a lot of
> time saved. My guess is, barring some real glitch that moving
> up won't change your actual sound processing much but a bunch
> of little changes in how things work may make it a lot nicer.
>
> Walt
> 
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ---------------------~--> 4 DVDs Free +s&p Join Now
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/pt6YBB/NXiEAA/Ey.> GAA/PMYolB/TM
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------~->
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> 
>
>=20
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU