birding-aus

Does Australia Have Too Many National Parks?

To: "calyptorhynchus ." <>
Subject: Does Australia Have Too Many National Parks?
From: Ian May <>
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2014 21:01:53 +1100
In Tasmania the Forest industry was still operating in 2011. In the past two years it has collapsed bringing down many associated businesses.

Compare 2011 figures to 2014 current figures and especially those relating to younger persons under 25

calyptorhynchus . wrote:

This is straying far from birding, but for there to a valid argument about
National Parks and conservation impoverishing Tasmania you need to show
that there was some sort of Golden Age of full-employment and tree
destruction in the past which came to end with the creation of National
Parks. Might be difficult to prove.

John Leonard


On 8 March 2014 12:58, Alan Gillanders <>wrote:

The answer to my request for actual figures on unemployment rates was not
sent to the list but I thought it relevant so have included it here.
Regards,
Alan

You should be able to dig those numbers up from the ABS site.  I have
looked at the Time Series profile for the Census data for Tasmania and it
gives the following answers.
Census year Unemployment Rate %
2011 6.4
2006 6.6
2001 10.1
1996 11.0
The pattern surprised me but my arithmetic seems OK.


Alan's Wildlife Tours
2 Mather Road
Yungaburra 4884

Phone 07 4095 3784
Mobile 0408 953 786
http://www.alanswildlifetours.com.au/
-----Original Message----- From: Greg and Val Clancy
Sent: Saturday, March 8, 2014 10:56 AM
To: Ian May ; Jeremy O'Wheel
Cc: birding-aus
Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Does Australia Have Too Many National Parks?

Correct me if I am wrong but the threatened subspecies of the Wedge-tailed
Eagle in Tasmania is adversely affected by logging.  I would be surprised
if
other species aren't similarly affected despite that fact that some species
thrive on the disturbance created by logging.


Regards

Greg

Dr Greg. P. Clancy
Ecologist and Birding-wildlife Guide
| PO Box 63 Coutts Crossing NSW 2460
| 02 6649 3153  | 0429 601 960
http://www.gregclancyecologistguide.com
http://gregswildliferamblings.blogspot.com.au/






-----Original Message----- From: Ian May
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 7:41 PM
To: Jeremy O'Wheel
Cc: birding-aus
Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Does Australia Have Too Many National Parks?


<>Jeremy

In Tasmania, dedicated National Parks cover about 20% of the State,
while more than 50% is tied up in State Reserves that exclude economic
activity considered normal even in National Parks Reserves in many other
parts of Australia (Mining exploration etc.).  We all know that National
Parks reserves also include Conservation Parks, Recreational Parks,
Regional Reserves, Game Reserves etc etc and not just National Parks.
The end result to the economy is the same if it restricts or excludes
most economic activity in the same manner.

Until recently, in most States of Australia, "Reasonable representation
of natural habitat" was considered a target of approximately 15% of the
habitat zones <>and few should object to reasonable representation of
natural areas for nature conservation and protection.   And No, I am not
suggesting open slather should be practiced in the rest.

But now the so called Tasmanian Forestry agreement proposes to reserve
more than 500,000 ha of previously logged forestry access areas (most of
which are dry sclerophyll forest and not "Old Growth Rain Forest") and
place under National Parks management.   As you would know, the
agreement even excludes selective logging forestry (sustainable
forestry), an industry that previously gave opportunity of employment to
many many underprivileged people in regional areas of Tasmania.  The
Forest Industry in Tasmania is now lost and these people have nowhere to
go.

It probably would not be so bad if there were some demonstrated
environmental benefits from all this but there are none that I can
see.   Even Masked Owls, Spotted Quail Thrush, Olive Whistlers, Pink and
Flame Robins do well in Selectively logged Forestry zones.

Anyway, enough diatribe from me but if you would like to name Tasmanian
bird species significantly disadvantaged by selective logging forestry,
I would appreciate the information.

Regards


Ian May
St Helens, Tasmania.



Jeremy O'Wheel wrote:

Actually Ian, in Tasmania about 21% of land is in national parks.  The
figures most often quoted is that over 40% is in National Parks and
"reserves."  Reserves have varying levels of protection, but are not
national parks.
Jeremy


On 6 March 2014 18:34, Ian May < <mailto:
>> wrote:

   Hello Tom

   Yes, I like to push some buttons too however in this debate I am
   only an ill informed observer.  It should be noted that reserving
   more than 50% of Tasmania to unmanaged National Parks Reserves has
   killed this states economy, condemned many of its residence to
   generations of welfare and created the worst circumstances
   possible for the management of wild fires.  But before linking recent
major bushfires, droughts etc. to some
   peoples theories about climate change, have a look at this.

   http://home.iprimus.com.au/foo7/fireall.html

   regards

   Ian

   ------------------------------------------------------------
------------




   Tom Tarrant wrote:

       Ian,

       After all the recent fires in Tasmania, will the 'good citizens of
       Tasmania' be more concerned about their economy or
       climate-change?....we recently saw the writing on the wall' in the
       Redcliffe by-election and I think there will be further
       surprises in
       the forthcoming re-run of the WA senate election,  I would like to
       think that there is still hope for Tassies Forests, and will still
       continue to push poll-buttons (....when I'm not at work),

       best of luck,

       Tom


       On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Ian May
       < <>> wrote:

           g'Day Peter, Dave and all

           Perhaps most Green zealots do little else but sit around
           and play with their
           iphones while waiting for an opportunity to push poll
           buttons and preach
           left wing philosophy.   It probably takes more time for
           more productive
           members of society who are mostly at work to find out or
           even bother with
           frivolous polls in Fairfax media.
           The reality seems to be, that the Green pendulum has swung
           back to the
           right.  Especially here in Tasmania, most if its good
           citizens appear to be
           fed up with the high social costs of being lumbered with
           green public policy
           that has achieved little more than to make the state a
           feel good playground
           for visitors.
           The saddest part is that despite such a high social cost,
           there has been
           little success in achieving reasonable conservation
           benchmarks, i.e.
           Orange-bellied Parrot.   The costly green experiment
           appears to have failed.

           regards


           Ian May
           PO Box 110
           St Helens, Tasmania. 7216
           Mob: 0428337956

           ------------------------------------------------------------
------------



           Peter Shute wrote:


               It's now on 83% yes, and the vote count has increased
               from about 3000 when
               I looked yesterday evening to nearly 120,000.

               At least it's now obvious it can't be believed.

               Peter Shute



                   -----Original Message-----
                   From: Birding-Aus
                   
                   <>] On
                   Behalf
                   Of Judy Leitch
                   Sent: Thursday, 6 March 2014 8:34 AM
                   To: 'Dave Torr'; 'Laurie Knight'
                   Cc: 'birding-aus'
                   Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Does Australia Have Too
                   Many National Parks?

                   I voted and at that time the NO vote was ahead, I
                   checked 5 mins later
                   and the YES vote had doubled :( This also happened
                   2 weeks ago in a Gold
                   Coast Bulletin online poll with regards a Cruise
                   Ship Terminal on our
                   wonderful Broadwater.
                   Check this out -


http://www.itnews.com.au/News/331994,ballot-stuffing-bot-hits-
                   news-ltd-polls
                   .aspx

                   Judy

                   -----Original Message-----
                   From: Birding-Aus
                   
                   <>] On
                   Behalf
                   Of Dave Torr
                   Sent: Thursday, 6 March 2014 7:19 AM
                   To: Laurie Knight
                   Cc: birding-aus
                   Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Does Australia Have Too
                   Many National Parks?

                   It is well known that all Fairfax readers are
                   left-wing, tree-hugging
                   greenies so why would any good conservative
                   government any any attention to
                   such a poll?


                   On 5 March 2014 17:55, Laurie Knight
                   <
                   <>> wrote:



                       There is a link between the conservation
                       estate and the

                   preservation

                       of wildlife.

                       The Australian PM is quoted as saying "We
                       don't support, as a government
                       and as a Coalition, further lockouts of our

                   forests ...We

                       have quite enough National Parks, we have
                       quite enough locked up forests
                       already. In fact, in an important respect, we
                       have too much locked


                   up forest."


                       There is a poll in the Fairfax media that runs
                       until 9 pm

                   EST, 10 pm

                       EDST and 7 pm WST where you can note your opinion.


http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/federal-politics/political-

news/no-more-national-parks-as-tony-abbott-pledges-to-

support-loggers-as-the-ultimate-conservationists-20140305-345zp.html

                       _______________________________________________
                       Birding-Aus mailing list
                       
                       <>
                       To change settings or unsubscribe visit:

http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org



                   _______________________________________________
                   Birding-Aus mailing list
                   
                   <>
                   To change settings or unsubscribe visit:

http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org


                   _______________________________________________
                   Birding-Aus mailing list
                   
                   <>
                   To change settings or unsubscribe visit:

http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org



               _______________________________________________
               Birding-Aus mailing list
               
               <>
               To change settings or unsubscribe visit:

http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org



           _______________________________________________
           Birding-Aus mailing list
           
           <>
           To change settings or unsubscribe visit:

http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org





   _______________________________________________
   Birding-Aus mailing list
    <>
   To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
   http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org


_______________________________________________
Birding-Aus mailing list

To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org


_______________________________________________
Birding-Aus mailing list

To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4335 / Virus Database: 3722/7167 - Release Date: 03/07/14

_______________________________________________
Birding-Aus mailing list

To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org




_______________________________________________
Birding-Aus mailing list

To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU