Windfarm finale (?)

To: <>
Subject: Windfarm finale (?)
From: "Chris Corben" <>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 19:53:54 -0500
Evan Beaver wrote:

I find the aesthetic argument complete nonsense. Compare a couple of
turbines dotted on old farming land, that could still be used, to a 25Ha
coal power plant and the associated mining degredation.

I just have to bite at this. How could it possibly be nonsense? If people don't like the look of them, that's how they feel about it. It isn't for you to argue otherwise.

Personally, I found them very pleasing to look at the first time I saw them. On the other hand, all sorts of beauty can be seen in pollution. Now the windmills have taken on a more sinister aspect.

And by the way, you aren't just talking about "a couple of turbines dotted on old farming land" - this rhetoric really is "complete nonsense". These things take over the landscape in their thousands! There is talk of putting 70 thousand on the Appalachian ridge - the only real mountain scenery in the whole eastern half of the US. Do you not think this will have a degrading impact on the scenery? Power lines might have been beautiful once - now there are just far too many of them to have that effect!

Cheers, Chris Corben


To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message: unsubscribe (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU