| Subject: | Re: Mixpre D: is a bit bucket worth the trouble and money |
|---|---|
| From: | "Curt Olson" flipov411 |
| Date: | Tue Dec 9, 2014 8:58 am ((PST)) |
If I had a MixPre D, I'd lean on it for A/D conversion > into some cheap au= dio recorder with a digital input. But lacking that (old MixPre), the PCM-M= 10 is excellent. Since line in of the PCM-M10 is 1/8" TRS, I figure there's nothing to gain = by using the XLR outs of the MixPre. The cable run only a few inches and it= 's a more tidy setup, which is important to me. Curt Olson MinnesotaSoundscapes.com Jonathan wrote: > HI Curt, > > Thanks a ton. Have you noticed any quality loss from either the conversio= n on the PCM m10 or the using a tape out instead of XLR? > > Thanks, > > Jonathan |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Mixpre D: is a bit bucket worth the trouble and money, jonathan . kawchuk |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Mixpre D: is a bit bucket worth the trouble and money, michael trommer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Mixpre D: is a bit bucket worth the trouble and money, jonathan . kawchuk |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Mixpre D: is a bit bucket worth the trouble and money, michael trommer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU