| Subject: | Re: Mixpre D: is a bit bucket worth the trouble and money |
|---|---|
| From: | "Curt Olson" flipov411 |
| Date: | Tue Dec 9, 2014 6:31 am ((PST)) |
I can't disagree with Dan on this. But a less expensive alternative that I'= ve been using, quite happily, for years is: MixPre (old version "Tape Out")= > Sony PCM-M10 line in. Definitely not as elegant as a 7xx, but perfectly = acceptable. Curt Olson MinnesotaSoundscapes.com Dan Dugan wrote: > I recommend a Sound Devices 702. > > -Dan > >> I am thinking of buying a Mixpre D for a couple reasons, but one con is = that there is't an onboard recording function (like the 502 has). I'll use = it with an iPad but it would be nice to have a more robust solution. > > |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Mixpre D: is a bit bucket worth the trouble and money, Dan Dugan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Mixpre D: is a bit bucket worth the trouble and money, michael trommer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Mixpre D: is a bit bucket worth the trouble and money, Dan Dugan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Mixpre D: is a bit bucket worth the trouble and money, michael trommer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU