| Subject: | Re: Mixpre D: is a bit bucket worth the trouble and money |
|---|---|
| From: | "michael trommer" trommer_michael |
| Date: | Tue Dec 9, 2014 8:35 am ((PST)) |
Hi Jonathan, The results have been excellent. My only complaint is that the levels on the Microtrack tend to be somewhat low when using the digital in (not quite sure why this is the case); having said this, boosting the gain in post still yields a very clean signal. Cheers, Michael On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:17 AM, [naturerecordists] <> wrote: > > > HI Curt, > > Thanks a ton. Have you noticed any quality loss from either the conversio= n > on the PCM m10 or the using a tape out instead of XLR? > > Thanks, > > Jonathan > > > -- http://michaeltrommer.blogspot.ca <http://michaeltrommer.blogspot.com/> |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Mixpre D: is a bit bucket worth the trouble and money, jonathan . kawchuk |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Mixpre D: is a bit bucket worth the trouble and money, jonathan . kawchuk |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Mixpre D: is a bit bucket worth the trouble and money, jonathan . kawchuk |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Mixpre D: is a bit bucket worth the trouble and money, jonathan . kawchuk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU