I agree with John about coincident arrays. Ocean and stream sounds might be=
among the few exceptions, as there often isn't a lot of spacial informatio=
n available to capture.
In case it might be helpful to someone who hasn't seen it before, here's a =
writeup of my experience with the whole matter...
http://minnesotasoundscapes.com/mic_rigs.html
Curt Olson
On Aug 5, 2013, at 3:59 AM, wrote:
> I think we have heard plenty of examples shared here on this group of non=
-coincident arrays producing good stereo localization without any aberratio=
ns being noticeable or problematic. I also think coincident arrays like XY,=
Blumlein, and MS will also produce localization aberrations, like on-axis =
lobes, depending on the polar frequency response of the particular micropho=
nes used. Ocean and stream sounds can be especially challenging with any ar=
ray, and I would agree, at least in specific instances, a coincident array =
may help simplify things.
>
> John Hartog
> rockscallop.org
|