naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: mic spacing vs spatial veracity

Subject: Re: mic spacing vs spatial veracity
From: "Dan Dugan" dandugan_1999
Date: Mon Aug 5, 2013 8:56 pm ((PDT))
> Any stereo array can easily be tested for efficacy by the simple expedien=
t of (while recording) walking across the soundfield in an arc equidistant =
from the mic array. If the spatial representation is accurate as captured, =
when the recording is played back over properly positioned loudspeakers (=
=B130=BA for conventional stereo; =B145=BA for X-Y Blumlein crossed figure-=
of-eight) the footsteps should progress evenly from one side to the other. =
You could be forgiven for thinking this would be the result in most cases, =
but in fact it seems to work only with crossed figure of eights and M-S arr=
ays, both coincident. All spaced arrays produce extremely aberrant results =
with this experiment.

Some years ago there was an AES paper (sorry I can't find it now) on a shoo=
t-out between a number of popular stereo arrays. ORTF got high marks for so=
urce positioning accuracy. Of course the quality of the mics would make a b=
ig difference, as many mics have poor coordination of directivity with freq=
uency.

In my own recordings I get very nice stereo panoramas from a classic Jeckli=
n Disc.

-Dan





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU