naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: mic spacing vs spatial veracity

Subject: Re: mic spacing vs spatial veracity
From: "Mike Rooke" picnet2
Date: Sun Aug 4, 2013 1:01 pm ((PDT))
Russell,

Heres a system Ive coined the Hyper Co-Incident mic:
https://soundcloud.com/urlme/pmhc1-water-rain-pebbles

This version is mounted inside and old AKG P3 dynamic mic body. (dynamic el=
ement removed). In the recording a thin foam cover and rode dead kitten are=
 used as a windscreen.

The recording theme as its name suggests is water and thunder although its =
more of a quick demo for the stereo image / low frequency response all the =
way to 16 Khz.

BR
Mike.


--- In  "rock_scallop" <> w=
rote:
>
> Hi Russell,
> I think we have heard plenty of examples shared here on this group of non=
-coincident arrays producing good stereo localization without any aberratio=
ns being noticeable or problematic. I also think coincident arrays like XY,=
 Blumlein, and MS will also produce localization aberrations, like on-axis =
lobes, depending on the polar frequency response of the particular micropho=
nes used. Ocean and stream sounds can be especially challenging with any ar=
ray, and I would agree, at least in specific instances, a coincident array =
may help simplify things.
>
> John Hartog
> rockscallop.org
>
>
>
> --- In  Russell Dawkins <rdawkins@> wrot=
e:
> >
> > Any stereo array can easily be tested for efficacy by the simple expedi=
ent of (while recording) walking across the soundfield in an arc equidistan=
t from the mic array. If the spatial representation is accurate as captured=
, when the recording is played back over properly positioned loudspeakers (=
=B130=BA for conventional stereo; =B145=BA for X-Y Blumlein crossed figure-=
of-eight) the footsteps should progress evenly from one side to the other. =
You could be forgiven for thinking this would be the result in most cases, =
but in fact it seems to work only with crossed figure of eights and M-S arr=
ays, both coincident. All spaced arrays produce extremely aberrant results =
with this experiment.
> > For most nature sound recordings I don't think it matters much - especi=
ally of animal sounds - but to me it does matter when I am trying to captur=
e what might be called an acoustic, such as a stream or a beachfront with w=
aves (to realistically capture the movement of the breaking part of the wav=
e).
> >
>







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU