naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: mic spacing vs spatial veracity

Subject: Re: mic spacing vs spatial veracity
From: "Russell Dawkins" airbornerecording
Date: Sun Aug 4, 2013 2:25 am ((PDT))
Any stereo array can easily be tested for efficacy by the simple expedient =
of (while recording) walking across the soundfield in an arc equidistant fr=
om the mic array. If the spatial representation is accurate as captured, wh=
en the recording is played back over properly positioned loudspeakers (=B13=
0=BA for conventional stereo; =B145=BA for X-Y Blumlein crossed figure-of-e=
ight) the footsteps should progress evenly from one side to the other. You =
could be forgiven for thinking this would be the result in most cases, but =
in fact it seems to work only with crossed figure of eights and M-S arrays,=
 both coincident. All spaced arrays produce extremely aberrant results with=
 this experiment.
For most nature sound recordings I don't think it matters much - especially=
 of animal sounds - but to me it does matter when I am trying to capture wh=
at might be called an acoustic, such as a stream or a beachfront with waves=
 (to realistically capture the movement of the breaking part of the wave).





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU