>...
> With a mic spacing
> of 2ft or 60cms, the "clean" object width is only 16 degrees wide. anythi=
ng
> wider than this becomes out of phase.
>...
Hi David, By this do you mean that with 60cm mic spacing a small sound obje=
ct like a nearby cricket quietly chirping will resolve clearly, while a lar=
ger sound object like some rocks falling in the midground will sound obscur=
ed?
>...
> 17 cms corresponds to the wavelength of sound at about 2Khz.
> The time difference at the notional head width of 17 cms corresponds to h=
alf
> a millisecond stereo time difference.
>...
Any thoughts on how a recording made with Jecklin's older OSS (Jecklin Disk=
)design specifying 16.5cm spacing might compare to a recording made with hi=
s later modified design specifying 36cm spacing?
John Hartog
oregonsoundscapes.com
"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/
<*> Your email settings:
Digest Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|