Hello, Gianni and thank you for the comment.
I have been using Nagra Ares BB+ since 2007. Korg didn't meet my
requirements at all. There were mainly 4 things I didn't like: The
switches, the self-noise, the hard disk and the structure of the
menu-system.
Best regards,
Arnthor Helgason
=DEann 5.8.2013 07:33, skrifa=F0i Gianni Pavan:
> nice recording
> I see you're using the Korg MR2. How you judge it ? in particular for the
> self noise on internal mics and on external inputs ?
>
> Gianni
>
>
> 2013/8/4 Mike Rooke <>
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> Russell,
>>
>> Heres a system Ive coined the Hyper Co-Incident mic:
>> https://soundcloud.com/urlme/pmhc1-water-rain-pebbles
>>
>> This version is mounted inside and old AKG P3 dynamic mic body. (dynamic
>> element removed). In the recording a thin foam cover and rode dead kitte=
n
>> are used as a windscreen.
>>
>> The recording theme as its name suggests is water and thunder although i=
ts
>> more of a quick demo for the stereo image / low frequency response all t=
he
>> way to 16 Khz.
>>
>> BR
>> Mike.
>>
>>
>> --- In "rock_scallop" <=
>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Russell,
>>> I think we have heard plenty of examples shared here on this group of
>> non-coincident arrays producing good stereo localization without any
>> aberrations being noticeable or problematic. I also think coincident arr=
ays
>> like XY, Blumlein, and MS will also produce localization aberrations, li=
ke
>> on-axis lobes, depending on the polar frequency response of the particul=
ar
>> microphones used. Ocean and stream sounds can be especially challenging
>> with any array, and I would agree, at least in specific instances, a
>> coincident array may help simplify things.
>>> John Hartog
>>> rockscallop.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --- In Russell Dawkins <rdawkins@>
>> wrote:
>>>> Any stereo array can easily be tested for efficacy by the simple
>> expedient of (while recording) walking across the soundfield in an arc
>> equidistant from the mic array. If the spatial representation is accurat=
e
>> as captured, when the recording is played back over properly positioned
>> loudspeakers (=B130=BA for conventional stereo; =B145=BA for X-Y Blumlei=
n crossed
>> figure-of-eight) the footsteps should progress evenly from one side to t=
he
>> other. You could be forgiven for thinking this would be the result in mo=
st
>> cases, but in fact it seems to work only with crossed figure of eights a=
nd
>> M-S arrays, both coincident. All spaced arrays produce extremely aberran=
t
>> results with this experiment.
>>>> For most nature sound recordings I don't think it matters much -
>> especially of animal sounds - but to me it does matter when I am trying =
to
>> capture what might be called an acoustic, such as a stream or a beachfro=
nt
>> with waves (to realistically capture the movement of the breaking part o=
f
>> the wave).
>>
>>
>
>
|