Subject: | Re: mic spacing vs spatial veracity |
---|---|
From: | madl74 |
Date: | Sun Aug 4, 2013 3:09 am ((PDT)) |
> Any stereo array can easily be tested for efficacy by the simple expedien= t of (while recording) walking across the soundfield in an arc equidistant = from the mic array. > ... > All spaced arrays produce extremely aberrant results with this experiment= . Russell, With reference to my recent mails, the difference is between volume level stereo and time difference stereo. You lose the time difference effect with= most loudspeaker setups, but if you listen on headphones, you get a stereo= image from spaced arrays such as dummy head recordings. The mic test I use is walking all around the rig shaking a canister of peanuts. This shows up the rear responses as well which can cloud a clean front response. If you tilt the mic rig, you can also check the top and bottom responses which all add up in the recording. David Brinicombe |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: mic spacing vs spatial veracity, Russell Dawkins |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: mic spacing vs spatial veracity, rock_scallop |
Previous by Thread: | Re: mic spacing vs spatial veracity, Russell Dawkins |
Next by Thread: | Re: mic spacing vs spatial veracity, rock_scallop |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU