| Subject: | Re: Phanton power and battery power |
|---|---|
| From: | "bwanakomba" bwanakomba |
| Date: | Wed May 1, 2013 2:42 am ((PDT)) |
Thanks. Also a battery leaked in my K6 unit so that wont have helped. My M= arantz PMD660 also died recently so I need to re-equipe myself in a major w= ay now. Was thinking of a sound devices unit if I can fund it, but am worri= ed about its battery use. The new Marantz also looks good. Also thinking = of a rhode mic which looks great but is much cheaper than a senn MKH mic. P= lus all the Rycote muffling gear. A --- In "Marc Myers" <> wrote: > > Running both has no benefit. If you have the option use the power from yo= ur recording device as, if I remember correctly, the signal is a little noi= sier when using microphone batteries with the ME66. Also, you if you run ou= t of power you notice it. I hate in-mic batteries as I always have to remem= ber how many hours have been used up. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Phanton power and battery power, bwanakomba |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Phanton power and battery power, klangstrand |
| Previous by Thread: | Phanton power and battery power, bwanakomba |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Phanton power and battery power, klangstrand |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU