> For me, the LS-11, NT4 (with blimp) and SASS-type mic array make a
> very good, basic recording kit for relatively little money. With any
> luck this technology will still be relevant 20 years from now. It's
> hard to see how it could improve much at this point, except maybe
> for quieter preamps to become more affordable.
John,
I haven't had my hands on an NT4 but it looks like a useful general
purpose mic.
Theoretically you should be able to narrow the stereo object width by
doing an R-L and L-R transform. Have you (or anyone else) got tracks I
could try this on?
The NT4 has a low output impedance. Has anyone tried a 1:2 transformer
into what is usually a mid impedance input? I know transformers are
unfashionable but they often work well. That would take the
sensitivity up to 24mV/Pa into > 800ohms.
BTW the idea of a rear capsule windshield is not the solution as
cardioid mics have an pressure gradient sensitivity. That's why
cardioids are also bad for handling noise, and why vocal mics are
usually omni. There is no substitute for a large efficient blimp.
Nothing is more frusttrating than to have wind ruin an interesting
recording.
David
David Brinicombe
North Devon, UK
Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - Ambrose Bierce
|