naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Is my equipment outdated?

Subject: Re: Is my equipment outdated?
From: "Scott Fraser" scottbfraser
Date: Tue Feb 19, 2013 8:21 am ((PST))
< Theoretically you should be able to narrow the stereo object width by
doing an R-L and L-R transform. >

Easier to narrow the field with the pan pots in the DAW, although I've never 
found the stereo field to be over wide with XY. If anything the opposite. 

< I know transformers are unfashionable but they often work well. >

It's a topic of polarized opinions. One side believes transformers equal 
distortion, the other believes active balanced inputs equals more RFI. The 
truth is that a transformer can be built with distortion characteristics (both 
harmonic & phase components) which are inaudible, & transformerless inputs can 
be built which are immune to all but the most extreme RF situations. An 
advantage to transformers is free gain. An advantage to transformerless inputs 
is lower cost & lighter weight. 

< BTW the idea of a rear capsule windshield is not the solution as cardioid 
mics have an pressure gradient sensitivity. That's why cardioids are also bad 
for handling noise, and why vocal mics are
usually omni.  >

This is true for lavaliers, but not for hand held vocal mics, which are 
generally intended for use with PA systems, & where omni patterns are, for all 
intents & purposes, unusable. Of handheld vocal mics, about 80 to 90% are 
cardioid, & the rest are hyperccardioid.

Scott Fraser








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU