Subject: | Re: Filing systems/software |
---|---|
From: | "Avocet" madl74 |
Date: | Sat Nov 17, 2012 5:03 pm ((PST)) |
> For those of you who categorize according to subject, how do you > define the actual subject? Most of my recordings can fit into at > least several easily identifiable subject categories, Scott, This is a tree stucture of categories and sub-cateogories. As I wrote before, I keep my original material in day/date order, but increasingly I am using shortcuts to cross-reference them. So bird recordings could have shortcuts in a <bird> folder, but they could also be listed as type of call, or seasonal. A more sophisticated system could put the shortcuts in a database. The trick is to keep the large data file only in one place. David David Brinicombe North Devon, UK Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - Ambrose Bierce |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Various recordings made in the Bolivian Amazon, Daan Hendriks |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Filing systems/software, Keith Smith |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Filing systems/software, Nick Dando |
Next by Thread: | Re: Filing systems/software, Keith Smith |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU