It brings me back to the very early days with the first experiments
trying to get stereo with a parabola, when a mono MD21 was in focus,
mixed with a kind of xy stereo by two electrets pointing sideways.
Is it a quiz? Do you know what was wrong?
But do we agree that something is wrong with it? Or would you say
that it is a matter of opinions?
With the purpose of making true demos of the SSM's, I would leave the
whining from the grain mill and the hiss from the stream, as well as
low frequency blasts.
If I could, I would remove my own breath, belly sounds or sounds from
the tripod however, without telling.
On Soundcloud I have told if my recordings have been EQ'ed or not.
I will certainly add more tracks later, where the stereo is shuffled
and manipulated in different ways, but then I will say so.
"With the purpose of making true demos of the SSM."
Other people have other purposes with their work.
That is totally okay with me.
At 22:28 2012-11-02, you wrote:
> > if you have a recording that you really want to share with people,
> > as a good example of what you think is "a good nature sound
> > recording "
>- what would you do?
>1/ Add it on SoundCloud as it is, - as you hear it -or
>2/ postproduce it, so that it fits better to PC loudspeakers and
>Taking 2/ first, no - I would not pre-distort it. I assume that anyone
>interested enough would be listening on a reasonalble stereo setup or
>1/ If it is too long, and often has blasts of wind or boring sections,
>I edit it to present a good sound excerpt. That's simple
>post-production. I use a bass roll-off as standard, and often adjust
>this in post production so that the piece sounds as I would have heard
>it. If I do an edit within a recording I usually note this in the
>However there are two processes I do not usually declare: De-hissing,
>and an occasional whine from a grainmill about a mile away. The hiss
>is usually from a stream in the woods and contribtes nothing to the
>widlife sounds, so I use my judgement to reduce this using Audacity
>and always doing a before/after comparison to see if it affects the
>wanted sounds. If it does, the hiss stays in. The whine is at a
>precise frequency and I've got a fine notch filter which reduces its
>effect, again making an "artistic" before/after judgement on the
>If all the above sounds like "manipulation", that started with the
>choice, placement and aiming of mics, recording level, and decinding
>when to push the record button.
>I've got weeks of rubbish recordings, but the ones that go out are
>those which, to my mind, represent the wildlife in this area. It is
>the end result which matters.
>BTW I've just put a stereo file on Soundcloud asking what is wrong
>North Devon, UK
>Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - Ambrose Bierce
>"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
>sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.
>Yahoo! Groups Links
Telinga Microphones, Botarbo,
S-748 96 Tobo, Sweden.
Phone & fax int + 295 310 01