Subject: | Re: Miniature Pseudo-SASS Array |
---|---|
From: | "mipartitus" mipartitus |
Date: | Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:57 am ((PDT)) |
--- In "Avocet" <> wrote: > BTW, has anyone actually measured the time delay on a SASS from say 60 > degrees? 175mm path length difference gives about 60ms. Our ears can > distingush about 1ms. I am very interested in this topic since I recently built my first DIY SASS, and am trying to make something as portable as possible. What I don't get is the 60 ms difference for a 175 mm path length. Shouldn't that be submillisecond level, more like half a millisecond? Interaural time differences are maximally 660 microseconds for humans, and hence much smaller differences are detected. Best, Gabriel |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Miniature Pseudo-SASS Array, Curt Olson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Miniature Pseudo-SASS Array, Bernie Krause |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Miniature Pseudo-SASS Array, Curt Olson |
Next by Thread: | Re: Miniature Pseudo-SASS Array, Bernie Krause |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU