naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: the frustrations of engine noise

Subject: Re: the frustrations of engine noise
From: "Peter Shute" pshute2
Date: Mon Jul 2, 2012 7:06 pm ((PDT))
I expect that anyone willing to pay for a nature recording already fully ap=
preciates how pervasive noise is.=0D
=0D
Peter Shute=0D
=0D
=0D
From:  =
.com] On Behalf Of Gregory O'Drobinak=0D
Sent: Tuesday, 3 July 2012 10:52 AM=0D
To: =0D
Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] the frustrations of engine noise=0D
=0D
=0D
=0D
Peter:=0D
=0D
Using a shotgun mic will not necessarily give one a 'purer' sample of the=
=0D
offending plane/vehicle. The spectrum and fine temporal detail will be diff=
erent=0D
from mic to mic, hence using a different mic to get the 'fingerprint' for n=
oise=0D
reduction may give you results that are less than ideal. There could also b=
e=0D
issues with the reference sample due to the shift in time when the sample w=
as=0D
taken resulting in further spectral and temporal differences. Not everyone =
can=0D
record in more than 2 channels in perfect phasing to have a 'reference' cha=
nnel=0D
available for noise matching.=0D
=0D
Best thing to do is ignore the noise or do something different if you can't=
 get=0D
rid of it via conventional EQ, Izotope, or whatever.=0D
=0D
Perhaps we should have a "National No Machines Day" or better yet, a week! =
But=0D
expect to get some flack from hard core urban noise addicts about that one.=
 I=0D
find that most motorcycles, especially Harleys, are the worst offenders. Ev=
en if=0D
fuel was $20.00 a gallon, you'd have plenty of motorcycles out & about. Too=
=0D
bad.=0D
=0D
Oh, and don't forget about the insane people that 'boom the hood' with thei=
r=0D
multi-kilowatt bass amps and twenty subwoofers in their vehicle. I had one =
of=0D
those sadists pull up behind me yesterday at a traffic light and it was=0D
intensely painful. Bass of that level can travel for miles.=0D
=0D
What we really need to do is to cultivate a true appreciation for silence a=
nd=0D
become less complacent if we are to reverse this onslaught of machine=0D
harassment. Gordon Hempton's idea of 'One Square Inch' is a good start, but=
=0D
that's just the tip of the iceberg. We need quiet (or no) machines, and the=
y=0D
need to be kept within certain boundaries.=0D
=0D
We also need to educate people to listen to the natural environment. I have=
 been=0D
involved in several nature soundwalks in the woods and have presented conce=
rts=0D
of nature sound recordings. This was done here at the Dunes National Lakesh=
ore=0D
in conjunction with Chicago Phonography and the The World Forum for Acousti=
c=0D
Ecology midwest chapter. We are making some inroads, but progress is slow. =
The=0D
people who have participated have really enjoyed these activities and their=
=0D
consciousness has been heightened as a result.=0D
=0D
So perhaps your comment about leaving the noise in the recordings to educat=
e=0D
people about the noise has great merit. In fact, we should have a moratoriu=
m on=0D
the sale and distribution of pristine nature recordings and only sell or=0D
propagate 'flawed' recordings with the info attached describing the offende=
rs.=0D
That way people will be forced to take care of the problem since, until the=
y do=0D
rectify the noise situation, they will not get any more pristine recordings=
 to=0D
reflect their efforts.=0D
=0D
Expect to get a great deal of opposition to this idea, however, from the fo=
lks=0D
on this list that profit from the sale of such pristine recordings. There w=
ill=0D
be many arguments and counter-arguments about this philosphcal position and=
 I=0D
may be burned at the stake for being a heretic. But life is short. Let's ge=
t on=0D
with it.=0D
=0D
Best regards,=0D
=0D
Greg=0D
=0D
________________________________=0D
From: Peter Shute <<pshute%40nuw.org.au>>=0D
To: "<naturerecordists%40yahoogroups=
.com>" <<naturerecordists%40yahoogro=
ups.com>>=0D
Sent: Mon, July 2, 2012 6:38:36 PM=0D
Subject: RE: [Nature Recordists] the frustrations of engine noise=0D
=0D
Would it be helpful when trying to remove such noise to have a purer sample=
 of=0D
it, say recorded simultaneously with a shotgun mic?=0D
=0D
And is it a good thing to totally avoid noisy recordings? How are the publi=
c=0D
going to become aware of the problem if all we ever produce are noise free=
=0D
recordings? Obviously for some purposes noise is unacceptable, but the stuf=
f we=0D
put on Soundcloud, etc, should be ok.=0D
=0D
Peter Shute=0D
=0D
From: <naturerecordists%40yahoogroup=
s.com> <naturerecordists%40y=
ahoogroups.com>]=0D
On Behalf Of vickipowys=0D
Sent: Tuesday, 3 July 2012 9:04 AM=0D
To: <naturerecordists%40yahoogroups.=
com>=0D
Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] the frustrations of engine noise=0D
=0D
Hi John,=0D
=0D
For jet plane noise, if they are high flying, you can try a low pass=0D
filter EQ (a simple procedure). Or to completely remove the jet=0D
noise you can try a brick wall filtering approach, i.e. completely=0D
remove all frequencies below, say, 1000 Hz, and replace that section=0D
with audio from a quiet location, just the section below 1000 Hz.=0D
For chainsaws and motorbikes their noise is worse because it goes up=0D
and down in pitch. Maybe the newer version of Izotope may be able to=0D
track the noise and remove it? I only have the older version of RX.=0D
=0D
Don't give up recording! Perhaps take your next holidays at a remote=0D
location :-)=0D
=0D
cheers,=0D
=0D
Vicki=0D
=0D
On 02/07/2012, at 10:57 PM, John Crockett wrote:=0D
=0D
> Greetings all,=0D
>=0D
> Trying to record soundscapes around southern Vermont has become a=0D
> very frustrating experience. I have hours of recordings, and only a=0D
> few minutes without some kind of engine noise: mostly jets, but=0D
> also prop planes, chainsaws, atvs, cars and trucks and motorcycles,=0D
> skidders, and who knows what else. It appears that we are in a=0D
> direct flight path for Logan airport in Boston, so that accounts=0D
> for a lot of it. These are sounds I have effectively screened out=0D
> in a lifetime of living here. I have always thought of this place=0D
> as quiet. But turn on the recorder and suddenly all that engine=0D
> noise comes to the fore. Not quiet at all.=0D
>=0D
> It makes no sense to me to get in my own noisy car and drive all=0D
> over the countryside trying to find quiet places. How contradictory=0D
> is that! I'm not having any luck finding quiet places anyway. This=0D
> noise has become such a frustration that I am sorely tempted to=0D
> give up recording altogether, having only barely begun.=0D
>=0D
> How have others dealt with this frustration? How have you worked=0D
> around it? Anybody have an airplane noise canceling microphone?!=0D
> Should we be hoping the price of oil goes through the roof?=0D
>=0D
> best wishes,=0D
>=0D
> John=0D
>=0D
> John Crockett=0D
> Westminster, VT=0D
>=0D
> Let us live in harmony with the Earth=0D
> And all creatures=0D
> That our lives may be a blessing=0D
>=0D
=0D
=0D
=0D









<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU