| Subject: | Re: R-44 issue |
|---|---|
| From: | "robin_parmar_sound" robin_parmar_soun= |
d Date: Thu Jun 21, 2012 7:19 pm ((PDT)) Gianni Pavan wrote: > what is your opinion about its self noise ? I have no opinion, but John Lundsten actually tested the Edirol R-44 self-n= oise. He found it to be much worse than the Edirol R-44 Pro, Fostex FR-2LE,= and other "shoulder" recorders. EIN was -109.4dB (-112.7dB A-weighted). -- Robin Parmar |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: R-44 issue, umashankar |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Adobe Flash issues with Mac OSX 10.4, vickipowys |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: R-44 issue, umashankar |
| Next by Thread: | 1. Re: R-44 issue, robin_parmar_sound |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU