naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

[Nature Recordists] Re: Olympus LS-11

To:
Subject: [Nature Recordists] Re: Olympus LS-11
From: Raimund <>
Lily,

Note that my self-noise tests are mainly aimed at recording soft animal sou=
nds,
in which this noise floor is one of the most important things to consider.=

However, I guess that recording (loud) music would be a different matter, w=
here
those noise figures are not that important.

In any case, I think that both the Sony PCM-M10 and the Olympus LS-11 have =
a
much better build quality than the less expensive Tascam DR-05 and (probabl=
y)
the Zoom H1. Unfortunately, I have never used any of the Zoom recorders. So=
, I
can't comment on that.

Regards,
Raimund

--- In  "lilyplants" <> wrot=
e:
>
> Raimund,
> As I remember you have the Sony M10 as well as the LS-11.
> I am contributing to purchase of a digital recorder for a friend who
> wants to return to song writing. She was in bands for 10 years and quit
> 10 years ago. She would use the recorder for hearing herself as well as
> small band. She is not tech savy. She will use on board mics and
> external mics.
> Two questions: I will offer buying her the Tascam dr 05 or the Zoom H1OR
> see if she wants to go in together to get the Sony M-10 or the Olympus
> LS-11.
> Would the Sony or Olympus be a better option.I've seen the self noise
> charts. Never heard the LS-11. Don't like the LS-10 sound.
> I really don't want to put money into either the Tascam or the Zoom, but
> if I did which one would you suggest.
> many thanks, lilyI have the Edirol HR09
>
>
> --- In  "animalsounds"
> <recordingbird@> wrote:>> Hi folks,> > Today I received the new
> Olympus LS-11 and performed a few quick tests. The preamplifier noise
> performance is pretty much the same as that of its predecessor, the
> LS-10. Though, I believe that the in-built microphones have been
> improved. In terms of the inherent noise, they seem to be very close to
> those of the SONY PCM-D50. Another useful improvement is the optional
> mono recording mode that will save storage space when using an external
> shotgun microphone for instance. > > Regards,> Raimund>--- In
>  "animalsounds" <recordingbird@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Today I received the new Olympus LS-11 and performed a few quick
> tests. The preamplifier noise performance is pretty much the same as
> that of its predecessor, the LS-10. Though, I believe that the in-built
> microphones have been improved. In terms of the inherent noise, they
> seem to be very close to those of the SONY PCM-D50. Another useful
> improvement is the optional mono recording mode that will save storage
> space when using an external shotgun microphone for instance.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Raimund
> >
>
>
>
>











<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU