naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Post Processing Workflow

Subject: Re: Post Processing Workflow
From: "Microscopica" audiofieldrecorder
Date: Fri May 6, 2011 8:13 am ((PDT))


I personally believe that editing field recordings should be limited to sim=
ple top & tailing, together with basic level adjustment purely for ease of =
listening. Unfortunately, through the ease of digital manipulation, we are =
becoming guilty of leaving a legacy of misrepresentation to future generati=
ons of both the casual listener and researcher.
Post-processing to remove noise from field recordings, will result in an ar=
tificial  ambience; one that does not actually exist!







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU