| Subject: | Re: Post Processing Workflow |
|---|---|
| From: | "Kenton Brede" ktbrede |
| Date: | Thu May 5, 2011 11:52 am ((PDT)) |
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Richard Folwell <>wrote= : > > > Kenton, > > The door slams are there in the first segment, but they are not very > loud. I needed to use headphones rather than domestic speakers to hear > them, but count 3 of them. > > I think this is an impressive demonstration of what the tool can do. > However with the removal of more intrusive unwanted sound you do, > inevitably, get artefacts in the sound you want to keep (either that, or > I have not yet worked out how to drive it properly :-)). > > OK Richard, I'll listen to it when I get home. -- Kent Brede http://sandhillsnaps.com/ http://aphotoaday.sandhillsnaps.org/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Post Processing Workflow, Richard Folwell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Soundscape Ecology =EF=BF=BD biophonic frog teachers, chrishails50 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Post Processing Workflow, Richard Folwell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Post Processing Workflow, Microscopica |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU