naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Binaural Upgrade

Subject: Re: Binaural Upgrade
From: "Martyn Stewart" mijdog2000
Date: Mon Nov 1, 2010 4:43 pm ((PDT))
Trombones? Brass band? I thought this was a nature Recordist group? I have =
never maxed out my mics in nature after recording over well over 40000 hour=
s. As far as I know lightning makes no noise but thunder does. :)

Martyn

Martyn Stewart

Sent from my iPhone
Please excuse any spelling mistakes on this tiny keyboard.

www.naturesound.org

On Nov 1, 2010, at 4:34 PM, James Shatto <> wrote:

> 140SPL, because proximity can and will exceed that level.  I've maxed out=
 a 125dB SPL mic at 18" with a trombone.  And I still had more to give.  Pu=
t a group of 100 trombones in front of that mic and no good can come of it.=
  With proximity.  Even without proximity you'll have someone clapping with=
in a few feet of your mics.  Maybe even some gun fire, door slams, screams =
of horror, and whatever mayham is modern life.  Not quite a nature requirem=
ent, but a wolf howl at less than 5 yards?  Lightning?  Gun fire?  A fallen=
 tree?  Or just a million plus insects, it all adds up.  Even if no one sou=
rce is > 86dB (safe levels), when combined their chorus is deafening.
>
> And then there's the distortion factor.  When mics operate at their limit=
s, they change character.  Having higher limits makes them sound better at =
most sane levels IMO.  Which is the main reason I got rid of my SM81's.  Wi=
th a brass quintet, nice mics.  With a brass band(40+ members), who replace=
d my mics with something not as good.  Plus you can't have 110dB+ of dynami=
c range if your mics suck past 100dB.  Not that noise floor means anything =
at those levels, but they can be reached in nature.  Rock slide, volcano, .=
..  perhaps not an everyday thing, but it can and ultimately will happen.  =
You only need it once to need it.
>
> - James
>
> --- On Mon, 11/1/10, Avocet <> wrote:
>
> From: Avocet <>
> Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Re: Binaural Upgrade
> To: 
> Date: Monday, November 1, 2010, 4:51 PM
>
>
>
> Sorry folks I've just posted on this subject but I need to cooment on
>
> this quote which has just downloaded:
>
> > SPL limit >=3D 140dB
>
> > S/N =3D> 80dB +/- 10 (higher is better)
>
> > Self Noise <=3D 15dB +/- 10 (A weighted / lower is better)
>
> > Response =3D 20Hz-20kHz
>
> What on earth is being recorded at 140dBA? What mic input stage will
>
> handdle that? That's well into ear damage country. 90 dBs is very
>
> uncomfortable, 50 dB higher is 100,000 times that sound energy level.
>
> Your ear wax will be moving. (Not a recommended treatment)
>
> A S/N is relevant to a recording, not a transducer. With a background
>
> noise of 30dBs (quiet), That's a recording of a 110 dBA sound. For a
>
> loud natural sound at 90dBA, this is asking for a noise level of
>
> 10DbA. That simply can't be done technically with the very best pro
>
> gear.
>
> A-weighting doesn't help noise figures as the thermal Johnson noise of
>
> the air rises with frequency. That's the datum for self noise. BTW I
>
> heard it once as a young teenager in a windless grassland and after my
>
> ears had settled down for over an hour. My heartbeat was loud and I
>
> could hear my pulse and behind that was a very high hiss.
>
> Beware of frequency response figures that don't quote +/- limits.
>
> Beware of those which do, as the curves are frequently smoothed out.
>
> As I said in my last email, above all, trust your ears first.
>
> David
>
> David Brinicombe
>
> North Devon, UK
>
>









<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU