naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Stereo recording with hydrophones

Subject: Re: Stereo recording with hydrophones
From: "Robb Nichols" robb_nichols
Date: Wed Jul 21, 2010 11:26 am ((PDT))
I don't know if the human hearing system is capable of directionality
underwater.  Any divers in the group?  The increased speed of sound will
minimize the phase difference between our ears and our body is made
mostly of water, so I have to assume that sound travels though it pretty
effectively underwater.  I assume that this sense is severely limited
while underwater.

But, as with so many other things, there is no reason why we can't use
the proper tools to enhance our senses.  This seems like more of a
philosophical question of whether sound should be recorded to accurately
recreate our auditory sensation, or whether it should be optimized for
our enjoyment.

On 7/21/2010 8:10 AM, Scott Fraser wrote:
>
>
> Does anybody know if the human hearing system is capable of
> directionality underwater? Given that the ear/brain evolved for use in
> air I'm wondering if the HRTF even works in an environment of
> profoundly different sound velocities. Without a standard then for
> spaciousness or stereo width underwater can we say that one stereo
> hydrophone system (widely spaced, near coincident, etc.) is more
> accurate in its soundfield than any other, especially given that the
> results will always be listened to in air?
> Just pondering what stereo means when underwater.
>
> Scott Fraser
>
>
>






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU