Subject: | Re: RME quadmic |
---|---|
From: | "Scott Fraser" scottbfraser |
Date: | Fri Jun 11, 2010 9:06 am ((PDT)) |
<<Making the generous assumption that the Quadmic noise is -129 dBV, it's 10 dB quieter than the microphone. That's good, but maybe not good enough. If you rms those two noise sources together that gives you a 2.4 dB increase in noise relative to the microphone with a 'perfect' preamplifier. OK, 2.4 dB isn't a substantial hit in performance. But you pay a lot for those quiet microphones!>> Since the preamp noise & the mic noise is not coherent I would not expect them to sum as you indicate. Two sine waves would, but I believe noise, which is random, would produce a much lower sum result. The stated EIN of -129 dBV is approximately equal to the better studio grade mic preamps & if the RME achieves that in the field on battery power it will certainly not be the source of noise degradation for any recordings you make with it. Scott Fraser |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Recorder comparison please, vickipowys |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: RME quadmic, Rob Danielson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: RME quadmic, Raimund |
Next by Thread: | Re: RME quadmic, Rob Danielson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU