naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Do we still love the NT1a?

Subject: Re: Do we still love the NT1a?
From: "hartogj" hartogj
Date: Thu Sep 10, 2009 12:59 pm ((PDT))
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for bringing up the shortcomings. One other issue that has been allu=
ded to in other recent posts is inconsistency in characteristics between in=
dividual mics. Included in the price for more expensive mics is higher qual=
ity control on critical components. That said, my two NT1As with sequential=
 S/N seem very well matched.

I have recorded many times in the rain and fog with no ill effect. The mois=
ture problems I have had seem directly correlated to ambient temperature fa=
lling below dew point. In cool, high condensation  conditions, I have had o=
ne or both mics go dead a couple of times.

John Hartog



--- In  "natureguyusa" <> wro=
te:
>
> David,
>
> I still love the NT1a, but they do have some shortcomings. The NT1a's are=
 very sensitive to wind, and I recommend a custom 2-3 chamber windscreens f=
or them. They are somewhat sensitive to moisture and may stop working under=
 high humidity, foggy conditions. I use a small heater, while recording, un=
der such conditions after they failed on me twice during warm, foggy condit=
ions. The failure was temporary, but I lost some very good material. They a=
re sensitive to picking up low frequency sounds very well, and sometimes th=
at is too good for picking up distant jets/motorcycles. They tend to be rat=
her bulky/heavy compared to other mics. Overall, when the shortcomings are =
solved, you would be hard pressed to find a better mic for nature recording=
, where the lowest self noise is the most important factor. They are very i=
nexpensive and robust. I never noticed any sound coloration from them. To m=
e, the recorded material has been very life-like. There maybe some high fre=
quency issues if the sound source is at the right distance, due to them hav=
ing a large diameter diaphragm, that may cause a "hole" effect, but I never=
 noticed that.
>
> Happy recording,
> Bruce Rutkoski
> www.natureguystudio.com
>
> - In  "wildlifeanalysis" <david.michael@=
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello
> >
> > I am looking to pick up another stereo microphone pair for some surroun=
d recordings, but before I do, I wanted to get the pulse of the community o=
n the NT1a. After hearing a number of field recordings made with the NT1a, =
I am convinced that if I was just starting out nature recording, I would bu=
y a couple of matched pairs and save myself thousands.
> >
> > Are there any new value contenders out there I should take a look at, o=
r are the Rode NT1a's still the kings of low cost, ultra-quiet, mics?
> >
> > David
> >
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU