| Subject: | SD 722 Vs 702 |
|---|---|
| From: | "chattopadhyay budhaditya" budhaditya= |
in Date: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:50 am ((PST)) Hi All, I am writing to ask fellow recordists to point out, what=A0are the exact sp= ecific advantages of Sound Devices 722 over 702? I am=A0asking rather from a practical point of view while working on variou= s field situations, suppose for wiser suggestions before ordering one of th= em.. Is compact flash reliable and of enough capacity for a quite long-run recor= ding? Hope to find your words soon. Greetings, Budhaditya=A0 ---------------- =A0 Budhaditya Chattopadhyay Sound Practice www.myspace.com/budhaditya |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Sound for microbe movies?, davidbarnas@aim.com |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: SD 722 Vs 702, Richard L. Hess |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Even viruses make sound, Bernie Krause |
| Next by Thread: | Re: SD 722 Vs 702, Richard L. Hess |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU