naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SD 722 Vs 702

Subject: Re: SD 722 Vs 702
From: "" flawn1951
Date: Sun Dec 14, 2008 6:15 am ((PST))
> I routinely use a 16GB CF card in a 702.   As others have mentioned, 32GB 
> is now available, but 16GB is already pretty cheap.
> 
If you want redundancy, you can record to TWO CF cards at once on a 702 by 
adding an external Firewire CF card "reader". I use the SanDisk Extreme which 
can do Firewire 800 once hooked up to a computer but records fine via Firewire 
400 from the 702. 

Because this is external CF attached with a cable to the Firewire jack, it's 
not as secure as the 722's internal hard drive / CF redundancy. But so far I 
haven't lost anything. The 722, by the same token, can do triple redundancy, 
recording to internal HD, internal CF, and external HD or CF simultaneously.

A 722 with hard drive spinning is fairly quiet, but with just CF it's 
definitely quieter. Definitely a difference for quiet field recordings where 
the 
mikes are close to the recorder. You can spin down the HD on a 722 if you need 
that extra quiet.

SSD hard drive replacements are getting bigger and cheaper for the 722,   but 
at the same time CF cards continue getting bigger and cheaper too. 16GB is 
over 25 hours of stereo 44.1 16 bit. Last one I bought was two months ago, 
under 
$35. 





**************
Make your life easier with all your friends, email, and 
favorite sites in one place.  Try it now. (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&
icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000010)






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU