Subject: | Re: [gear] MKH 8040 sample comparison |
---|---|
From: | "Greg Weddig" gweddig |
Date: | Thu May 1, 2008 8:29 am ((PDT)) |
Here you go, these are LARGE full bandwidth files: 24/96 I have normalized them by ear to be close, and brought them up about 10db from where they were recorded. Bottom end is rolled off starting at about 250Hz. Schoeps http://gregweddig.net/prettyboy/schoeps_mk21_ortf_2496_sample.wav or http://tinyurl.com/4wlcrg Sennheiser http://gregweddig.net/prettyboy/sennheiser_8040_ortf_2496_sample.wav or http://tinyurl.com/4v3aq6 They will be posted for about a week... --greg weddig --- In "Mike Feldman" wrote: > > > > It would be nice to have much shorter samples as > > high-rez waves to compare/analyze (eg. 30 sec of 24/96). > > If there's some loud impact source along with quiet, even better. Then Greg wrote: > I will try to post a short 24/96 sample later today. There is a > definite difference in the sound between the two, which I realized > isn't quite as apparent once the MP3 conversion has had it's way with > the files. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [gear] MKH 8040 sample comparison, Dan Dugan |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [gear] MKH 8040 sample comparison, Greg Weddig |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [gear] MKH 8040 sample comparison, Dan Dugan |
Next by Thread: | Re: [gear] MKH 8040 sample comparison, Greg Weddig |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU