Subject: | Re: [gear] MKH 8040 sample comparison |
---|---|
From: | "Philip Tyler" macmang4125 |
Date: | Sat May 3, 2008 10:44 am ((PDT)) |
Thanks Scott, it all makes sense now. Phil ----- Original Message ---- From: Scott Fraser <> To: Sent: Saturday, 3 May, 2008 4:01:17 PM Subject: [Nature Recordists] Re: [gear] MKH 8040 sample comparison <<May I ask, the MKH 8000 series does this comprise a 'body' and a seperate 'mic' capsule?>> Yes, although all the active electronics are in the removable capsule module. The 'body' merely houses the XLR connector. The already exceptionally compact form factor can thus be further reduced by using an active cable system, like the Schoeps Collette series. <<Will Senneheiser include a figure-of-eight in this range, do you know by any chance?>> A figure eight is said to be forthcoming. Scott Fraser __________________________________________________________ Sent from Yahoo! Mail. A Smarter Email http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [gear] MKH 8040 sample comparison, Aaron Ximm |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Hard Disk recording at higher elevations, Lou Judson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [gear] MKH 8040 sample comparison, Aaron Ximm |
Next by Thread: | Re: Hi-MD "bottoming-out" (was Plug In Power), Andrew Carter |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU