naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: New Equipment: KorgMR1000 v Sound Devices 702

Subject: Re: New Equipment: KorgMR1000 v Sound Devices 702
From: "Chris Edwards" chris2edwards
Date: Tue Mar 25, 2008 5:03 pm ((PDT))
On Mon, 24 Mar 2008, artsonics wrote:

|     Are you saying that the Korg MR1000 suffers because of the DSD
| technology or have Korg simply failed to design their micpreamp
| cicuitry well enough and therefor any advantages of the DSD format is
| lost because of this.

I suspect the latter.  As I understand it, to take advantage of any 
benefits offered by DSD, you'd need an absolutely top class, studio 
quality mic-pre/input stage.  Neither of the korg MR DSD portable 
recorders have such.  Therefore it's kinda hard to see the point of the 
DSD here.

Plus there's not alot you can do with your file once you've recorded it.

(apart from converting it to PCM...)




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU