| Subject: | New Equipment: KorgMR1000 v Sound Devices 702 |
|---|---|
| From: | "artsonics" artsonics |
| Date: | Sun Mar 23, 2008 6:40 pm ((PDT)) |
Gianni,
Are you saying that the Korg MR1000 suffers because of the DSD
technology or have Korg simply failed to design their micpreamp
cicuitry well enough and therefor any advantages of the DSD format is
lost because of this. Are you implying that there is other inherent
flaws with either DSD or the way Korg has implemented DSD in these units?
Is it possibly a software issue? Perhaps you know of a suitable
modification or work around? Any assistance would be appreciated.
thanks.
clint
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: New Equipment: KorgMR1000 v Sound Devices 702, Aaron Ximm |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | xeno-canto -> africa, w.p.vellinga |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: New Equipment: KorgMR1000 v Sound Devices 702, Aaron Ximm |
| Next by Thread: | Re: New Equipment: KorgMR1000 v Sound Devices 702, Dan Dugan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU