Subject: | Re: New Equipment: KorgMR1000 v Sound Devices 702 |
---|---|
From: | "Aaron Ximm" aaron_gmail |
Date: | Sun Mar 23, 2008 4:20 pm ((PDT)) |
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 1:48 AM, artsonics <> wrote: > I purchased a Korg MR1000 last August and I am regretting it. The > big problem with the Korg is the very hissy mic preamps that are > totally unsuitable as a field recorder,especially for low level sounds. Fwiw, if you want to sell it, you might try the Taperssection Forums or particularly the classifieds at Gearslutz... on the "location sound" forum I haunt at the latter, there are numerous vocal proponents who regularly proclaim their love of that unit for their kind of work, and think it has the best "character" of the current recorders in its vague price range... (including the Sound Devices 7 series). Just goes to show how specific the requirements are for nature recording! best, aaron -- quietamerican.org oneminutevacation.org 83% happy 9% disgusted 6% fearful 2% angry |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: New Equipment: KorgMR1000 v Sound Devices 702, John Tudor |
---|---|
Next by Date: | New Equipment: KorgMR1000 v Sound Devices 702, artsonics |
Previous by Thread: | Re: New Equipment: KorgMR1000 v Sound Devices 702, John Tudor |
Next by Thread: | New Equipment: KorgMR1000 v Sound Devices 702, artsonics |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU