Subject: | Re: is mkh416 an upgrade from me66? |
---|---|
From: | "Paul Jacobson" thebrunswicktwitcher |
Date: | Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:11 pm ((PDT)) |
Thanks for summarising the specs. I notice the datasheet for the me-66 shows the LF response rolls off from about 750Hz, whereas the 416 is flat down to 100Hz. Any idea what impact this has on the overall self noise spec? Anyway it sounds like it might be worth hanging on to the ME66 until I can compare them side by side. cheers Paul On 20/10/2007, at 4:32 AM, Walter Knapp wrote: > As far as MKH416 vs ME66 vs MKH60, the specs: > > MKH416 - 25mV/Pa sensitivity - 13dBA self noise > > ME 66 - 50mV/Pa sensitivity - 10dBA self noise > > MKH60 - 40mV/Pa sensitivity - 6dBA self noise > > As you can see, the MKH416 specs are not as good as the other two and > the MKH60 has the best specs, particularly if you count in it's > frequency response curve, which is pretty flat compared to the > ME66. In > addition, the MKH416's polar patterns have a lot of irregularities in > them compared to the other two. It really is a older generation mic. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: is mkh416 an upgrade from me66?, John Lundsten |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: is mkh416 an upgrade from me66?, Philip Tyler |
Previous by Thread: | Re: is mkh416 an upgrade from me66?, John Lundsten |
Next by Thread: | Re: is mkh416 an upgrade from me66?, Philip Tyler |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU