| Subject: | Re: is mkh416 an upgrade from me66? |
|---|---|
| From: | "John Lundsten" lundsten_john |
| Date: | Fri Oct 19, 2007 1:19 pm ((PDT)) |
I would agree with all that bar that to me "warm" means deficient in HF - b= ut in a nice kinda way, and the 416 is far from that, it has a very pleasan= t (to my ears) mid/hf boost or presence which is great on dialog and pretty= fine for many Fx too. And yes the HKH60 is a tad more accurate which is of= ten less to the point than sounding right for the job in hand. John Lundsten |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: is mkh416 an upgrade from me66?, Tim Nielsen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: is mkh416 an upgrade from me66?, Paul Jacobson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: is mkh416 an upgrade from me66?, Tim Nielsen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: is mkh416 an upgrade from me66?, Paul Jacobson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU