| Subject: | is mkh416 an upgrade from me66? |
|---|---|
| From: | "Paul Jacobson" thebrunswicktwitcher |
| Date: | Thu Oct 18, 2007 6:58 pm ((PDT)) |
Hi All, I've just come across a mkh416 at a reasonable price and was wondering what peoples thought's were on this mic? I'm currently using the K6/ME66 and find that while it is very quite, it's a bit thin sounding tonally. Would a 416 be an improvement? cheers Paul |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: New rules in from Interior Dept, Martyn Stewart |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: is mkh416 an upgrade from me66?, Steve Pelikan |
| Previous by Thread: | 2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10..................................................., Unknown |
| Next by Thread: | Re: is mkh416 an upgrade from me66?, Steve Pelikan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU