| Subject: | Re: is mkh416 an upgrade from me66? |
|---|---|
| From: | "Paul Jacobson" thebrunswicktwitcher |
| Date: | Thu Oct 18, 2007 7:57 pm ((PDT)) |
sounds like it's worth investigating further in that case... On 19/10/2007, at 12:26 PM, umashankar wrote: > of course the 416 is an upgrade. it is a huge upgrade from the me66. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: is mkh416 an upgrade from me66?, umashankar |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: is mkh416 an upgrade from me66?, Paul Jacobson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: is mkh416 an upgrade from me66?, umashankar |
| Next by Thread: | Re: is mkh416 an upgrade from me66?, Paul Jacobson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU