naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: is mkh416 an upgrade from me66?

Subject: Re: is mkh416 an upgrade from me66?
From: "umashankar" umashanks
Date: Thu Oct 18, 2007 7:26 pm ((PDT))
of course the 416 is an upgrade. it is a huge upgrade from the me66.

i have published my poems. you can read (or buy) at http://stores.lulu.com/=
umashankar



----- Original Message ----
From: Steve Pelikan <>
To: 
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 7:46:42 AM
Subject: [Nature Recordists] Re: is mkh416 an upgrade from me66?

Paul

I don't know as I've never used either but according to

http://www.microphone-data.com/microphone.asp

the ME66 has higher output and lower self noise.

Steve P
--- In  Paul Jacobson <> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've just come across a mkh416 at a reasonable price and was
> wondering what peoples thought's were on this mic?
> I'm currently using the K6/ME66 and find that while it is very quite,  =

> it's a bit thin sounding tonally. Would a 416 be an improvement?
>
> cheers
> Paul
>




"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause

Yahoo! Groups Links



Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU