Subject: | Re: Flash based IDE drives... |
---|---|
From: | "Eric Benjamin" ericbenjamin2 |
Date: | Wed Jul 25, 2007 6:18 pm ((PDT)) |
--- Rory <> wrote: > Do you have any actual evidence to support the > statements that you make about problems with hard > drives? What Oryoki said was that SSDs, relative to hard disks are: "less vulnerable to shock while operating" Which is not really open to dispute. As an example, the Seagate Barracuda IV disk drives that I favor for desktop usage have an operating shock rating of 63 Gs. In contrast, the Sandisk SSDs are rated at 1500 Gs. No contest. The question is one of whether the shock limits of conventional hard drives are reached in actual use. Based on my experiences designing products of similar size, I certainly think that the shock limit of the Seagate drive, for example, would be exceeded if it were dropped while operating. Of course, your answer to that may be "don't drop it". I concur, but in field usage it may happen. Eric |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Flash based IDE drives..., Rory |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Flash based IDE drives..., Rory |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Flash based IDE drives..., Rory |
Next by Thread: | Re: Flash based IDE drives..., Rory |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU