Subject: | Re: Understanding bit-depth conversion and dithering |
---|---|
From: | "Lou Judson" inaudio |
Date: | Wed May 23, 2007 1:06 pm ((PDT)) |
I have a 744T. It has 24 bit convertors. It has 16 bit recording with or without dither. Without dither it is truncated 24 bit. Not a fair comparison. I have hundreds of old DAT recording from my 16 bit era. History. I feel like a race care driver discussing pickup trucks. I'd like to bow out of a discussion I never should have joined in the first place. I see no reason to continue trying to convince people of what I know is obvious - 16 bit to me is a delivery medium, akin to MP3, and I will originate 24 bit if there is any processing after the recording... Y'all can do as you like. <L> On May 23, 2007, at 12:35 PM, Raimund Specht wrote: > > If you had a common recorder such as a SoundDevices 7xx unit, you > could simply select the 16 bit format from the menu. The dither option > can also be disabled... |
Previous by Date: | Re: Understanding bit-depth conversion and dithering, Raimund Specht |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Understanding bit-depth conversion and dithering, Martyn Stewart |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Understanding bit-depth conversion and dithering, Raimund Specht |
Next by Thread: | Re: Understanding bit-depth conversion and dithering, Martyn Stewart |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU