Subject: | Re: Understanding bit-depth conversion and dithering |
---|---|
From: | "Philip Tyler" macmang4125 |
Date: | Wed May 23, 2007 4:41 am ((PDT)) |
I did find this very useful in explaining dither: http://www.users.qwest.net/~volt42/cadenzarecording/DitherExplained.pdf Others of course may disagree :-) Phil --- Raimund Specht <> wrote: > In my previus posting I forgot to mention an > important point that > applies to a 24 to 16 bit conversion: > > When converting a 24 bit recording to 16 bit, there > is usually alrealy > enough noise in the original recording. For this > reason, I belive that > it is not required to add additional dither noise. > However, this is > probably just nit picking... > > Raimund > > > > ___________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Mail is the world's favourite email. Don't settle for less, sign up = for your free account today http://uk.rd.yahoo.com/evt=3D44106/*http://uk.docs.= yahoo.com/mail/winter07.html |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Understanding bit-depth conversion and dithering, Raimund Specht |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Understanding bit-depth conversion and dithering, Mark R. |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Understanding bit-depth conversion and dithering, Raimund Specht |
Next by Thread: | Re: Understanding bit-depth conversion and dithering, Mark R. |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU