Subject: | Re: Understanding bit-depth conversion and dithering |
---|---|
From: | "Raimund Specht" animalsounds |
Date: | Wed May 23, 2007 12:38 pm ((PDT)) |
Lou Judson wrote: > I could not make a 16 bit original any more except with a minidisc or = > laptop - all my convertors operate at 24 bit, with dither if I want > 16 bit results. I feel that strongly about the benefits, and the low > cost of 24 bit for the advantages. If you had a common recorder such as a SoundDevices 7xx unit, you could simply select the 16 bit format from the menu. The dither option can also be disabled... I already made that comparison and could not find any difference as long as I used an appropriate gain. Everybody who owns a high-quality recorder such as a SD7xx, TASCAM HD-P2 or Fostex FR-2xx can do this comparison on his own. So, I wonder why there is still no A/B comparison test that provides a reliable proof for your statements. Raimund |
Previous by Date: | Re: Understanding bit-depth conversion and dithering, Lou Judson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Understanding bit-depth conversion and dithering, Lou Judson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Understanding bit-depth conversion and dithering, Lou Judson |
Next by Thread: | Re: Understanding bit-depth conversion and dithering, Lou Judson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU